Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Bomb blast outside court 11 killed in New Delhi



A powerful bomb hidden in a briefcase ripped through a crowd of people waiting to enter a New Delhi courthouse Wednesday, killing 11 people and wounding scores more in the deadliest attack in India’s capital in nearly three years. An al-Qaida-linked group claimed responsibility, though government officials said it was too early to name a suspect.
The attack outside the High Court came despite a high alert across the city and renewed doubts about India’s ability to protect even its most important institutions despite overhauling security after the 2008 Mumbai siege. “Have we become so vulnerable that terrorist groups can almost strike at will?” opposition lawmaker Arun Jaitley asked in Parliament.
The bomb left a deep crater on the road and shook the courthouse, sending lawyers and judges fleeing outside. “There was smoke everywhere. People were running. People were shouting. There was blood everywhere. It was very, very scary,” said lawyer Sangeeta Sondhi, who was parking her car near the gate when the bomb exploded. The government rallied Indians to remain strong in the face of such attacks.
“We will never succumb to the pressure of terrorists,” Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said during a visit to neighboring Bangladesh. “This is a long war in which all political parties and all the people of India will have to stand united so that this scourge of terrorism is crushed.” The bomb exploded about 10:14 a.m. near a line of more than 100 people waiting at a reception counter for passes to enter the court building to have their cases heard.
The blast killed 11 people and wounded 76 others. Their identities were not available, but no judge were among the victims. People ran to assist the injured, piling them into three-wheeled taxis to take them to the hospital. Ambulances and forensic teams rushed to the scene, along with sniffer dogs and a bomb disposal unit, apparently checking for any further explosives.
Renu Sehgal, a 42-year-old housewife with a case before the court, had just received her pass and was standing nearby with her uncle and mother while her husband parked their car when she heard the explosion. “The sound was so huge and suddenly people started running,” she said. “We were all in such a big panic. I’m lucky I survived.” The court building was evacuated after the attack.
The blast probe was quickly turned over to the National Investigation Agency, established after the Mumbai siege to investigate and prevent terror attacks. Police were scouring the city for possible suspect, searching hotels, bus stands, railway stations and the airport, said top security official U.K. Bansal. All roads out of the city were under surveillance as well, he siad.
Late Wednesday, police also released two sketches they said were based on descriptions given by eyewitnesses who claimed they had seen someone with a briefcase waiting in line outside the building. “We are determined to attack down the perpetrators of this horrific crime and bring them to justice,” Home Minister Palaniappan Chidambaram told Parliament. An email sent to several TV news channels claimed the bombing on behalf of Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami, an Islamic extremist group said to be based in Pakistan that was blamed for numerous terror strikes in India.
The U.S. State Department says the group has deep ties to al-Qaida, and some of its members have trained at the groups camps. The email demanded the immediate repeal of the death sentence handed to Afzal Guru, a Kashmiri man convicted to target other courts, including the Supreme Court. “We cannot say anything about the email until we have investigated it thoroughly,” NIA chief S.C. Sinha said. “At this point the investigation is fully open and it’s not possible to name any group.”
The court bombing was the first major terror attack in India since a trio of blasts in Mumbai killed 26 people on July 13. Suspicion for those attacks fell on the shadow extremist network known as the Indian Mujahedeen, though no one has been arrested. The bombers struck the court, an appeals panel below India’s Supreme Court, even though the capital had been on high alert because Parliament was in session. On May 25, a small explosion that appeared to be a failed car bomb erupted in the court’s parking lot.
After the 2008 Mumbai attacks, the government expanded police recruiting and training, set up the NIA and established commando bases across the country so rapid reaction forces could swiftly arrive at the scene on an attack. Jaitley, in Parliament, said the court bombing raised “deep concern” about “the kind of institutions and systems we have to build to fight this menace.” But official say the number of targets in a nation of 1.2 billion makes it impossible to provide full security.
Dharmendra Kumar, a senior police officer, told reporters the court building itself was strongly protected by police but the explosion hit a busy main road outside. K.P.S. Gill, a former senior police official, said Kumar’s comment showed the police had a “ridiculous mindset” and India needed to rethink its strategy on Preventing terror. “If the public collects there, then you must protect that area,” Gill said.
The attack rekindled memories of the string of deadly bombings that rocked the country in 2008, including a series of coordinated bomb blasts in New Delhi on Sept. 13 that killed 21 people. Many of those attacks were blamed on militant groups composed of disaffected Muslins furious at perceived injustices at the hands of India’s Hindu majority. But that violence mostly abated after the November 2008 siege of Mumbai, when 10 Pakistan-based militants wreaked havoc across India’s commercial capital for 60 hours, killing 166 people.
However, a series of smaller attacks raised concerns in recent months that the violence was returning. Last Sept. 19, two gunmen on a motorcycle shot and wounded two Taiwanese men outside a famous New Delhi mosque. A few minutes later, a bomb rigged to a nearby car malfunctioned and caught fire. On Dec 7, a bomb exploded in the city of Varanasi, killing a 2-year-old, and a few months later came the failed attack on the High Court in New Delhi. Wednesday a statement from the government of Pakistan expressed “deepest sympathies” for the families of those killed in the explosion and the government and people of India.

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Government planned to crush my agitation: Hazare


Anti-graft crusader Anna Hazare on Tuesday said the Union government had planned to crush his agitation, by putting him under house arrest in his village Ralegan Siddhi, right after he came out of Tihar Jail.
Mr. Hazare said the Centre had also kept an Air Force plane ready at the Delhi airport.
Addressing visitors in Ralegan Siddhi, Mr. Hazare said: “The idea was to airlift me from Delhi airport, where an Air Force flight was waiting, to Pune. From Pune, they would send me to Ralegan Siddhi, where I would not have been allowed to go anywhere.” He called the government's plan a part of a “betrayal.”
The Delhi Police had arrested Mr. Hazare on August 16, hours before his slated hunger strike for the Jan Lokpal Bill at the JP Park. Within hours, the police withdrew the charges against Mr. Hazare, who however refused to leave the jail premises demanding unconditional permission to fast on the Ramlila grounds.
The activist earlier alleged that his arrest was planned at the Home Ministry level, even as the government denied the charge.
Commenting on Parliament members allegedly taking money for vote during the confidence motion, Mr. Hazare said they should be “hanged.” “If anyone in the Assembly or Parliament takes money for asking questions or casting votes, there should be stringent punishment for them. In fact I feel they should be hanged.”
Mr. Hazare refuted charges levelled by Congress general secretary Digvijay Singh that Mr. Hazare was a “mask for the RSS.”
Mr. Singh said in Jammu that the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and the Bharatiya Janata Party used Baba Ramdev and Anna Hazare as their mask, to divert people's attention from the arrests of RSS activists in terrorism and corruption cases.
Reacting to Mr. Singh's comments, Mr. Hazare said, “Those who are making allegations should first produce evidence.”

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Prasoon Joshi pens poems for Anna’s movement



Common complaints and public ombudsman


Common complaint, for instance if he is in office, and ration cards are built and are asked for a bribe, it is not income tax refund, poor women are denied the widow pension, it is asked for a bribe . Many people say that such complaints were brought to the Ombudsman so that millions will make complaints to the Ombudsman and the Ombudsman shall be the whole system collapsing. 

हमारा ये मानना है कि ये बाते बिल्कुल गलत हैं क्योंकि हमने जो व्यवस्था लोकपाल कानून के अन्दर की है वो ये है कि पहले उस विभाग का एक अधिकारी काम करेगा अगर वो काम नहीं करता तो वो शिकायत हैड ऑफ द डिपार्टमेण्ट के पास जाएगी। वो भी काम नहीं करता तो लोकपाल के विजिलेंस अफसर के पास ये पावर होगी कि वो इन दोनों अफसरों की तन्ख्वाह काटे और वो आपको मुआवज़े के रूप में दे और इनके खिलाफ भ्रष्टाचार का मुकदमा दायर करें।

The day - by - day operational be accountability will improve the entire system. 4, 5, 6, 10 new officers so that public complaints can be settled quickly. 

With millions of people who will not join the movement. The day that the public is that those abuses have sought to bribe him hear. Prevention is the mass of the Ombudsman in the bill. So we think that if millions of people that for the thousands of complaints that the government should then have to appoint officers. He now can not be sidelined. You must tell the public what the public's complaints may be brought or not brought under the purview of Lok Pal.

Some people say that the Ombudsman only large - to large cases, 2 - spectrum to examine, to check the Commonwealth Games, to the general ration water, not to speak of, the Panchayats are not talking about corruption If you're in the street in front of the house, not to speak of corruption. What do you want? What do you want ombudsman? Do you want the Ombudsman? Or do you want ombudsman is small or big corruption is corruption, corruption of all of the talk. He says that if all these people's ombudsman to the corruption of others who will be the system collapsing, we do not think so. We have Kailkuleshn about it and we start to believe that if they need, much more Apfsron Apfsron deployed in the Ombudsman against corruption should be punished severely. Two - three years you will see that it will reduce corruption. And then you need less people in the Public Ombudsman. Cases of corruption will be deleted on low.

Judiciary and the Public Ombudsman


Check corruption in judiciary
Corruption in our country's justice system has reached a peak, the day we read in the newspapers that a certain - certain allegations of corruption against the judge, but unfortunately in our entire system of judges to check corruption for their trial and there is no free agency. Mass of corruption against judges of the ombudsman bill is written. 

The present system of judicial corruption control 
According to the current system if you want to file a FIR against the corruption of a judge, then we have to seek permission from the Chief Justice of the Indian. लेकिन जनलोकपाल कानून में लिखा है कि अब चीफ जस्टिस ऑफ इण्डिया से इजाज़त नहीं लेनी होगी, क्योंकि अभी तक का इतिहास यह बताता है कि जब-जब चीफ जस्टिस ऑफ इण्डिया से इजाज़त मांगी गई, तब-तब उन्होंने भ्रष्ट जजों के खिलाफ इजाज़त देने से declined. 

Many people believe that it filed an FIR against corrupt judges did not give power to the Ombudsman. He believes that today is the system that the Chief Justice of the Indian to file case against the corrupt judges give permission, to carry on the system. But the question is whether these systems? This is to limit corruption in the justice system? Or is this corruption?

After Jnlokpal law
Allow a judge to investigate and found guilty of corruption against his seven-member bench of Ombudsman will be allowed to proceed.जनलोकपाल बिल में सुझाव दिया है कि भ्रष्ट जज के खिलाफ एफ.आई.आर दर्ज करने के पहले देश के मुख्य न्यायधीश की जगह लोकपाल के सात सदस्यों (जिसमें कानूनी पृष्ठभूमि के लोग बहुतायत में हों), की बैंच इस बारे में निर्णय लें और खुले The hearing will be in the whole world to know it was right or wrong given that permission.

Confusion about the judiciary 
Drafting Committee in the crucial issue of corruption in the justice system began, the media has been printed so that the top judge in the place - the system will be brought to the Ombudsman. This creates an illusion that would have threatened the independence of justice system.

Strict action against corrupt judges and to mark the image of our justice system and increase its independence. If their names were withheld so filthy dirty the pond fish will like. 
The third meeting of the committee drafting the bill the United Ombudsman, Mr P. Chidambaram said that the former judge Jnlokpal bill are against the measure. The reference Venktchelaya Justice and Justice JS Verma was on. 

Venktchelaya Justice himself has felt himself paid the wrong process.They were judge for yourself if the Prdn Justice Ajit Sen Gupta, Shri P. Chidambaram against him FIR he had not sought permission to enter. FIR against him despite the evidence Was not allowed to enter. That is now expected that the system of public justice of today - has always given protection to corruption in the system, change it all together.

The country now stands at a historical turning point. On the one hand around the corruption, poses a threat to the survival of India, on the other public organizations and the movement has contributed to a new ray of hope. Corruption in the justice system in the historic occasion will be leaving the country will never forgive us.

Justice Venkata Chelaya a judicial reform bill is drafted and they want justice - a system of corruption to get things under that law. His idea is very good. Created by the draft bill has not yet public. There's just so much work on it. 

Some people have said that the Ombudsman in the realm of justice - to bring order to the corruption of their workload will increase manifold. It is misleading to people in the country's Supreme Court and High Court judge over 1,000 total. Prdn a retired judge, had once said that nearly 20 percent higher in the justice system is corrupt judge. Even if it is assumed that all complaints will come together nearly 200 complaints against the coach.So little work is not going to collapse from the ombudsman system. 

Some people also think that the judges judge the situation. Therefore, the right to make decisions about their corruption should be given to judges.It's just wrong. If a judge takes a bribe or do not understand what it is obvious that. Taking bribes is wrong. We avoid such arguments.

Anna fasting: leaves lasting impact on people’s lives

This is not the end, but a new beginning — this was the general mood on Sunday after Anna Hazare ended his fast. People at the Ramlila Maidan claimed that the movement has only inspired them to continue the revolution in their day-to-day lives.The movement, driven largely by undying public support and enthusiasm, has resulted in heightened awareness of corruption and how it has bled the country white. "I had planned to pay Rs 4,000 as bribe to clear an exam, as I felt I wasn't sufficiently prepared. But after participating in the movement, I have promised myself never to do it. I will not be corrupt," said Deepak Rathi, an engineer from Faridabad.Rahul Raghav, businessman, said: "The first step is not to pay bribe anymore. I own an HR consultancy firm, and most of the time, we have to pay bribes to hire consultants. But this will happen no more, even if I suffer losses. If everyone stops paying bribe, no one will face problems."A group of civil services aspirants present at the grounds claimed that the movement had inspired them to envision future where electoral reforms, decentralization of power and direct involvement of people in nation building was possible. "I am impressed to see that a change at such a mass level could be brought about through the united effort of the common people. Perhaps it has helped to make many people less cynical about life. The movement has certainly given the youth an adrenaline rush," said Dhruva Sharma of the group.Megha Nand Lakhera, who had come with her husband and three-year-old daughter to celebrate the "people's win", said: "Now we will not ignore everyday corruption that we tolerated earlier: be it at ration shops or in public transport. These small things will make a difference, and we have brought our daughter along, hoping that we will be able to educate her for a better tomorrow."

Citizens' group to fight Pune civic elections.


Inspired by social activist Anna Hazare's endeavour to rid society and politics of corruption and yoga guru Baba Ramdev's dream of a clean socio-political scenario, people from various walks of life have come together to form a forum called Pune Nagrik Sanghatana (PNS). It is learnt that the forum will take part in the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) election and the official announcement in this regard is expected in the next two days. 

The new forum is getting support from intellectuals, educationists, former politicians, journalist-editors and RTI activists. PNS is, in a way, a revival of the Nagri Sanghatana established by the editor of a local Marathi daily in 1968 for clean and fair politics.

"We are inspired by the Nagri Sanghatana and are, in a way, renaming it by the addition of the word 'Pune'," said 72-year old Ramesh Agarwal, coordinator of PNS. The forum has had four meetings in the past two months and has already got support from former IAS officers Arun Bhatiya and Avinash Dharmadhikari, the industrialist Firodiya brothers, and former mayors Ankush Kakade and Shantilal Suratwala.

RTI activist Vivek Velankar, educationist Dr S B Muzumdar, former union minister and environmentalist Mohan Dhariya and veteran journalist Dwarkanath Lele are also supporting the forum. "We are appealing to all those supporting us to submit their confirmation letters soon. PNS has already got popular with many Punekars and even members of other political parties," said Agarwal.

"We are putting up 30 to 40 candidates by confirming their credentials and their good character by taking interviews." Col Jayant Chitale (Retired), founder president, Maharashtra Military Foundation, who is preparing the PNS manifesto, said he would not be contesting the civic election but was helping the PNS prepare for it.

"We are bringing together good and intelligent people who want to make Pune a better place to live in in the future. We are creating transparency in our system and promoting people with good character for the election," said Chitale. 

Anna Hazare Interview