Common complaints and public ombudsman

Common complaint, for instance if he is in office, and ration cards are built and are asked for a bribe, it is not income tax refund, poor women are denied the widow pension, it is asked for a bribe . Many people say that such complaints were brought to the Ombudsman so that millions will make complaints to the Ombudsman and the Ombudsman shall be the whole system collapsing. 

हमारा ये मानना है कि ये बाते बिल्कुल गलत हैं क्योंकि हमने जो व्यवस्था लोकपाल कानून के अन्दर की है वो ये है कि पहले उस विभाग का एक अधिकारी काम करेगा अगर वो काम नहीं करता तो वो शिकायत हैड ऑफ द डिपार्टमेण्ट के पास जाएगी। वो भी काम नहीं करता तो लोकपाल के विजिलेंस अफसर के पास ये पावर होगी कि वो इन दोनों अफसरों की तन्ख्वाह काटे और वो आपको मुआवज़े के रूप में दे और इनके खिलाफ भ्रष्टाचार का मुकदमा दायर करें।

The day - by - day operational be accountability will improve the entire system. 4, 5, 6, 10 new officers so that public complaints can be settled quickly. 

With millions of people who will not join the movement. The day that the public is that those abuses have sought to bribe him hear. Prevention is the mass of the Ombudsman in the bill. So we think that if millions of people that for the thousands of complaints that the government should then have to appoint officers. He now can not be sidelined. You must tell the public what the public's complaints may be brought or not brought under the purview of Lok Pal.

Some people say that the Ombudsman only large - to large cases, 2 - spectrum to examine, to check the Commonwealth Games, to the general ration water, not to speak of, the Panchayats are not talking about corruption If you're in the street in front of the house, not to speak of corruption. What do you want? What do you want ombudsman? Do you want the Ombudsman? Or do you want ombudsman is small or big corruption is corruption, corruption of all of the talk. He says that if all these people's ombudsman to the corruption of others who will be the system collapsing, we do not think so. We have Kailkuleshn about it and we start to believe that if they need, much more Apfsron Apfsron deployed in the Ombudsman against corruption should be punished severely. Two - three years you will see that it will reduce corruption. And then you need less people in the Public Ombudsman. Cases of corruption will be deleted on low.

Judiciary and the Public Ombudsman

Check corruption in judiciary

Corruption in our country's justice system has reached a peak, the day we read in the newspapers that a certain - certain allegations of corruption against the judge, but unfortunately in our entire system of judges to check corruption for their trial and there is no free agency. Mass of corruption against judges of the ombudsman bill is written. 

The present system of judicial corruption control 

According to the current system if you want to file a FIR against the corruption of a judge, then we have to seek permission from the Chief Justice of the Indian. लेकिन जनलोकपाल कानून में लिखा है कि अब चीफ जस्टिस ऑफ इण्डिया से इजाज़त नहीं लेनी होगी, क्योंकि अभी तक का इतिहास यह बताता है कि जब-जब चीफ जस्टिस ऑफ इण्डिया से इजाज़त मांगी गई, तब-तब उन्होंने भ्रष्ट जजों के खिलाफ इजाज़त देने से declined. 

Many people believe that it filed an FIR against corrupt judges did not give power to the Ombudsman. He believes that today is the system that the Chief Justice of the Indian to file case against the corrupt judges give permission, to carry on the system. But the question is whether these systems? This is to limit corruption in the justice system? Or is this corruption?

After Jnlokpal law

Allow a judge to investigate and found guilty of corruption against his seven-member bench of Ombudsman will be allowed to proceed.जनलोकपाल बिल में सुझाव दिया है कि भ्रष्ट जज के खिलाफ एफ.आई.आर दर्ज करने के पहले देश के मुख्य न्यायधीश की जगह लोकपाल के सात सदस्यों (जिसमें कानूनी पृष्ठभूमि के लोग बहुतायत में हों), की बैंच इस बारे में निर्णय लें और खुले The hearing will be in the whole world to know it was right or wrong given that permission.

Confusion about the judiciary 

Drafting Committee in the crucial issue of corruption in the justice system began, the media has been printed so that the top judge in the place - the system will be brought to the Ombudsman. This creates an illusion that would have threatened the independence of justice system.

Strict action against corrupt judges and to mark the image of our justice system and increase its independence. If their names were withheld so filthy dirty the pond fish will like. 

The third meeting of the committee drafting the bill the United Ombudsman, Mr P. Chidambaram said that the former judge Jnlokpal bill are against the measure. The reference Venktchelaya Justice and Justice JS Verma was on. 

Venktchelaya Justice himself has felt himself paid the wrong process.They were judge for yourself if the Prdn Justice Ajit Sen Gupta, Shri P. Chidambaram against him FIR he had not sought permission to enter. FIR against him despite the evidence Was not allowed to enter. That is now expected that the system of public justice of today - has always given protection to corruption in the system, change it all together.

The country now stands at a historical turning point. On the one hand around the corruption, poses a threat to the survival of India, on the other public organizations and the movement has contributed to a new ray of hope. Corruption in the justice system in the historic occasion will be leaving the country will never forgive us.

Justice Venkata Chelaya a judicial reform bill is drafted and they want justice - a system of corruption to get things under that law. His idea is very good. Created by the draft bill has not yet public. There's just so much work on it. 

Some people have said that the Ombudsman in the realm of justice - to bring order to the corruption of their workload will increase manifold. It is misleading to people in the country's Supreme Court and High Court judge over 1,000 total. Prdn a retired judge, had once said that nearly 20 percent higher in the justice system is corrupt judge. Even if it is assumed that all complaints will come together nearly 200 complaints against the coach.So little work is not going to collapse from the ombudsman system. 

Some people also think that the judges judge the situation. Therefore, the right to make decisions about their corruption should be given to judges.It's just wrong. If a judge takes a bribe or do not understand what it is obvious that. Taking bribes is wrong. We avoid such arguments.